Process Safety Management (PSM)

Reminders from South Africa's Past

Written by Mr Johan Taljaard

Process safety and occupational safety are often conflated, yet they serve distinct roles in risk management. Process Safety Management (PSM) focuses on preventing large-scale catastrophic failures—such as explosions, structural collapses, and toxic releases—that result in mass casualties, environmental disasters, and severe economic losses. In contrast, Occupational Safety Management primarily addresses individual workplace injuries, such as slips, trips, and falls, which, while significant, do not have the far-reaching consequences of process safety failures.

Process safety incidents are characterized by their low frequency but high impact. PSM is a structured, systematic approach to identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks associated with hazardous processes in high-risk industries, including mining, nuclear, construction, oil and gas, petrochemical, and energy sectors. By integrating engineering controls, operational discipline, and management oversight, PSM safeguards people, assets, and the environment.

Process safety management (PSM) is a blend of engineering, operations and management skills focused on preventing catastrophic accidents, particularly structural collapse, explosions, fires and toxic releases associated with loss of containment of energy or dangerous substances such as toxic gases, molten metal, chemicals and petroleum products.

Key elements of PSM include:

  • Operational readiness
  • Asset Integrity Reliability and Maintenance
  • Operational Discipline
  • Workforce Competency
  • Process Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
  • Process safety information
  • Mechanical Integrity

Organizations that implement strong PSM frameworks proactively manage process-related hazards, reducing the likelihood of major incidents and enhancing operational resilience.

 

Major Process Safety Incidents in South Africa

Refinery Incidents

  1. Astron Energy Refinery Explosion (July 2020) – Cape Town, Western Cape
  2. Engen Refinery Explosion (December 2020) – Durban, KwaZulu-Natal
  3. Natref Refinery Fire (January 2025) – Sasolburg, Free State

Mining Incidents

  1. Lily Mine Collapse (February 2016) – Barberton, Mpumalanga
  2. Impala Platinum Mine Elevator Incident (November 2023) – Rustenburg, Northwest

Energy Incidents

  1. Medupi Power Station Explosion (August 2021) – Lephalale, Limpopo
  2. Kusile Power Station Flue Gas Duct Failure (October 2022) – Mpumalanga

Construction & Structural Failures

  1. George Building Collapse (August 2021) – George, Western Cape
  2. Parliament Fire (January 2022) – Cape Town, Western Cape
  3. Bree Street Gas Explosion (July 2023) – Johannesburg CBD, Gauteng

Hazardous substances  & Chemical Incidents

  1. KZN Chemical Spill (July 2021) – Durban, KwaZulu-Natal (Chemical warehouse fire during civil unrest.)
  2. Boksburg Tanker Explosion (December 2022) – Boksburg, Gauteng (Fuel tanker explosion.)

Of the 12 catastrophic incidents, only one report is available. Despite their severity, official investigation reports and root cause analyses are scarce and not publicly accessible.

The failure of Process Safety Management (PSM)

The failure to implement effective PSM has led to catastrophic incidents driven by:

  • Asset Integrity Failures
  • Design Flaws and Engineering Deficiencies
  • Inadequate Maintenance Programs
  • Non-Compliance with Safety Regulations
  • Poor Risk Assessments
  • Competence gap- Lack of skills and experience plant maintenance, production and engineering personnel
  • Lowering best practice standard
  • Wrong focus on personal safety the zero harm imitative

Strengthening PSM through robust maintenance, hazard identification, risk mitigation, and operational discipline is critical in preventing future disasters.

Lack of Investigations and Transparency

The absence of transparent, detailed root cause analyses in major industrial incidents limits the ability of professionals and organizations to learn from past failures and implement effective risk mitigation strategies

  • Limited Public Access to Investigation Findings: Neither the Department of Employment and Labour (DoEL-OHSA) nor the Department of Minerals and Resources (DMRE-MHSA) mandate public disclosure of investigation findings.
  • Reactive vs. Proactive Regulatory Approach: Regulatory bodies often act only after incidents occur, rather than enforcing preventative measures.
  • Criminal vs. Technical Investigations: Investigations tend to focus on criminal culpability rather than technical lessons, leaving industries reliant on speculation, media reports, and eyewitness accounts.

The Boksburg tanker explosion serves as a stark example of the consequences of this knowledge gap. Without a proper technical investigation, industry professionals remain uninformed about the precise failure mechanisms, increasing the risk of future incidents.

Occupational Safety vs. Process Safety: Bridging the Gap

Personal safety programs, such as slip, trip, and fall prevention, do not adequately address the complexities of process safety. Four key distinctions highlight this gap:

  1. Mechanisms of Causation: Process safety focuses on managing high-energy hazards, whereas occupational safety deals with lower-energy risks.
  2. Scale of Consequences: Process safety incidents, though less frequent, have far more severe consequences.
  3. Engineering and Design Focus: Process safety emphasizes system integrity, while occupational safety prioritizes individual protection.
  4. Focus: Process safety focus on Operations Integrity Management System: while Personal safety focus on Occupational Health and Safety Management System  

Many catastrophic incidents occur after early warning signs are overlooked. However, Highly Reliable Organizations (HROs) successfully benefits from PSM a to avoid major events. 

In power plants, refineries, mining operations, and energy infrastructure, Process Safety Management (PSM) provides several key benefits:

Reduces Operational Risks – Identifies and mitigates hazards in power generation (thermal, nuclear, renewable), mining, and energy transmission systems.

Enhances Reliability & Performance – Ensures equipment integrity, minimizing downtime and improving efficiency.

Improves Safety Culture – Embeds a proactive process safety mindset across all levels of the organization.

Ensures Regulatory Compliance – Helps meet international and local safety, environmental, and operational regulations.

Prevents Incidents & Environmental Damage – Reduces catastrophic failures, fires, explosions, and hazardous emissions.

Supports Sustainability Goals – Aligns with ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) principles, promoting responsible and sustainable energy and mining operations

South Africa must adopt fundamentals in process safety principles to prevent further disasters. The cost of inaction is too high. PSM is a management system that protects lives, the environment, and valuable assets. It's critical for safeguarding industrial operations. 

Final Thoughts

Process safety failures in South Africa continue to result in business interruptions, loss of life, environmental degradation, and economic strain. Over the past 30 years, regulatory bodies have not been able to ensure industry-wide safety. It is up to industry leaders and companies to adopt global best practices, develop  and improve their own process  safety standards, and invest in training their engineers, production teams, and process safety personnel.

Strengthening Process Safety Management (PSM) is essential to staying in business and avoiding unnecessary surprises. It is not just a regulatory minimum requirement—it is a moral and economic imperative.

This article was written and published 02 February 2025. 

View our MHS Guide View our SHERQ training  
© 2022 | iStec Training | All Rights Reserved | Designed & Developed by ThinkTank Creative
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram